Monday, April 13, 2015

Is the Re-appointment Process of Judges Broken - the Endorsement of the Hon Patricia Worth


On Thursday March 19, 2015 was a moment of truth at the re-appointment hearing for the Hon Patricia Worth. A gang of lawyers, a representative of the bar, a judge and the head of the Judicial re-appointment committee came to give testimony about Judge Worth - which was glowing. Stating that we are lucky in this state to have such a judge, that this judge is caring about the clients before her, helping those who are Prose and involved in the community. If the testimony stopped there (and quite often it does), one would come away from the hearing that there is nothing wrong with our judges in this state. Classic lawyer references of another lawyer

But these fawning views are out of touch with reality in our Family Courts and courts in general.

A unique and quite different "reality check" was offered by several parents and concerned citizens. They did something that was previously unthinkable. These parents and citizens stood before the States Judiciary Committee, a room full of lawyers and judges and told true, personal stories of Judicial abuse which was inflicted and suffered in the Judge Worth Family Court.

These parents and citizens who went before the Judicial Committee were scared, upset, concerned and outnumbered by those testifying from the legal profession. They were in a personally uncomfortable position but had the strength to stand up and let the committee know - their elected Representatives - that there is a problem. A BIG problem that has been festering for years which needs to be addressed.

Their testimony touched all listeners, as they presented the human face of parents ripped away from their children. Stripped financially. Emotions drained by the process that a judge put them through.

Are our Family Courts there to inflict punishment on good parents? In the Worth Court one would think that is the case where good solid parents are prevented from having a relationship with their children. Supervised visits are common, testing, screening and various questionable courses with no end in sight. No goal for outcome - but there is always a carrot being dangled in front of their faces to keep them hoping, keep them hooked. These parents would be better served by Child Protective - because the worse of abusers has a goal. Not in this court.

How many lawyers came out to testify that there might be a problem with this court? By our count not one. You see there is a disincentive to tell the truth when the committee is collecting testimony. As a lawyer working in Hon Patricia Worth's court, if I speak ill of her performance and behavior I put my professional career at risk. I put my family's financial lives at risk. Because now the Judge can pay back my testimonial truth in unfavorable judgements.  Or… engineer a 'Sua sonte' complaint with the Overseers of the Bar against me.

These parents and concerned citizens took a risk. You can also. It you have been hurt by the Family Court process. By a Guardian ad litem. Speak up and let your representatives know what you went through. Rock the boat and educate those around you. If you remain silent - change will never come. You can bet the other side is talking. Support Family Court reform. Contact us at MeGALalert@gmail.com - find us on Facebook or call/text 207-370-9801

Provided here is some of the testimony given by concerned citizens and parents:

Dr Jerome A Collins - Audio

Kirk Thomas - Audio

Laurie Ryan - Audio

Christie Griffin - Audio

Christie Starett - Audio

Please note that some of these files are large and may take some time to load in your browser. If you would like a copy of the audio please feel free to download or email us requesting a copy.

6 comments:

  1. Will there be audio posted from those who endorsed Judge Worth?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the question. All of the video will be posted on another page "Voice of the people" - in the next few days.

      Delete
  2. Who has the most to loose if the judge were not reappointed? Josh Tardy would as he was supporting (I assume) the re-appointment of this judge. What does this say about the character of this person working for LePage. Not a lot. I wish I could have made it to give testimony. It took more strength and character to stand up in opposition than to give an endorsement. Thank you to all who opposed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for commenting. Those people who spoke in opposition are the true heroes.

      Delete
  3. Did Josh Tardy tell the Committee how many lawyers opposed the re-appointment? I would guess that there were none (for the reasons listed above in the post). In which case then this was just a rubber stamping of the judges re-appointment and a corruption of the process. The Re-appointment committee seems to be a good idea in theory but in practice fails - and we get the possibility of a bad judge re-appointed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are not aware of any lawyers who opposed the re-appointment of the Hon Patricia Worth. We suspect that there were none - but then again - any lawyer who might oppose this judge could pay for that opposition. There is no incentive to oppose by the legal industry.

      Delete