On Thursday March
19, 2015 was a moment of truth at the re-appointment hearing for the Hon
Patricia Worth. A gang of lawyers, a representative of the bar, a judge and the
head of the Judicial re-appointment committee came to give testimony about
Judge Worth - which was glowing. Stating that we are lucky in this state to
have such a judge, that this judge is caring about the clients before her,
helping those who are Prose and involved in the community. If the testimony
stopped there (and quite often it does), one would come away from the hearing
that there is nothing wrong with our judges in this state. Classic lawyer
references of another lawyer
But these fawning
views are out of touch with reality in our Family Courts and courts in general.
A unique and quite
different "reality check" was offered by several parents and
concerned citizens. They did something that was previously unthinkable. These
parents and citizens stood before the States Judiciary Committee, a room full
of lawyers and judges and told true, personal stories of Judicial abuse which
was inflicted and suffered in the Judge Worth Family Court.
These parents and
citizens who went before the Judicial Committee were scared, upset, concerned
and outnumbered by those testifying from the legal profession. They were in a
personally uncomfortable position but had the strength to stand up and let the
committee know - their elected Representatives - that there is a problem. A BIG
problem that has been festering for years which needs to be addressed.
Their testimony
touched all listeners, as they presented the human face of parents ripped away
from their children. Stripped financially. Emotions drained by the process that
a judge put them through.
Are our Family
Courts there to inflict punishment on good parents? In the Worth Court one
would think that is the case where good solid parents are prevented from having
a relationship with their children. Supervised visits are common, testing,
screening and various questionable courses with no end in sight. No goal for
outcome - but there is always a carrot being dangled in front of their faces to
keep them hoping, keep them hooked. These parents would be better served by
Child Protective - because the worse of abusers has a goal. Not in this court.
How many lawyers
came out to testify that there might be a problem with this court? By our count
not one. You see there is a disincentive to tell the truth when the committee
is collecting testimony. As a lawyer working in Hon Patricia Worth's court, if I
speak ill of her performance and behavior I put my professional career at risk.
I put my family's financial lives at risk. Because now the Judge can pay back
my testimonial truth in unfavorable judgements.
Or… engineer a 'Sua sonte' complaint with the Overseers of the Bar
against me.
These parents and
concerned citizens took a risk. You can also. It you have been hurt by the
Family Court process. By a Guardian ad litem. Speak up and let your
representatives know what you went through. Rock the boat and educate those
around you. If you remain silent - change will never come. You can bet the
other side is talking. Support Family Court reform. Contact us at
MeGALalert@gmail.com - find us on Facebook or call/text 207-370-9801
Provided here is
some of the testimony given by concerned citizens and parents:
Dr Jerome A Collins
- Audio
Kirk Thomas - Audio
Laurie Ryan - Audio
Christie Griffin -
Audio
Christie Starett -
Audio
Please note that some of these files are large and may take some time to load in your browser. If you would like a copy of the audio please feel free to download or email us requesting a copy.
Please note that some of these files are large and may take some time to load in your browser. If you would like a copy of the audio please feel free to download or email us requesting a copy.
Will there be audio posted from those who endorsed Judge Worth?
ReplyDeleteThank you for the question. All of the video will be posted on another page "Voice of the people" - in the next few days.
DeleteWho has the most to loose if the judge were not reappointed? Josh Tardy would as he was supporting (I assume) the re-appointment of this judge. What does this say about the character of this person working for LePage. Not a lot. I wish I could have made it to give testimony. It took more strength and character to stand up in opposition than to give an endorsement. Thank you to all who opposed.
ReplyDeleteThank you for commenting. Those people who spoke in opposition are the true heroes.
DeleteDid Josh Tardy tell the Committee how many lawyers opposed the re-appointment? I would guess that there were none (for the reasons listed above in the post). In which case then this was just a rubber stamping of the judges re-appointment and a corruption of the process. The Re-appointment committee seems to be a good idea in theory but in practice fails - and we get the possibility of a bad judge re-appointed.
ReplyDeleteWe are not aware of any lawyers who opposed the re-appointment of the Hon Patricia Worth. We suspect that there were none - but then again - any lawyer who might oppose this judge could pay for that opposition. There is no incentive to oppose by the legal industry.
Delete